Adam Tooze:<\/strong> What a lot of people are saying is very significant about these protests, which began in Tehran\u2019s Grand Bazaar on Dec. 28, is that they are not about specific issues or politics but a general sense of economic malfunction. And the fact that they started in the bazaar is itself significant, because the bazaar is not just a bazaar in the sense you might understand it as a tourist but it is actually a major hub of Tehran\u2019s economy. And politically and historically, it\u2019s played a key role, going back over 100 years\u2014all the way back to the constitutional revolution in Persia, what became modern Iran, in the beginning of the 20th century. So it\u2019s that kind of an upheaval, the sense that the ground is shifting.<\/p>\nThe trigger here is the exchange rate, which has fallen. Basically, it seems to halve against the U.S. dollar every year, which creates an exponential acceleration, a brutal devaluation of the currency. They\u2019ve had to actually change the currency unit to allow people to cope. It\u2019s really a delegitimizing process. Anyway, everyone agrees that this undermines political legitimacy, and we\u2019re seeing it. The actual inflation rate is less extreme, but it\u2019s bad. It\u2019s running at more than 40 percent, which is very painful. And for food items, we\u2019re talking about 70 percent.<\/p>\n
If you look at the GDP numbers, and even if you look at the currency, it looks more like a progressive, horrendous squeeze that is reaching a critical point rather than a banking crisis like the one in 2008. People do worry about the stability of the Iranian banking system. And the key issue may be around inequality. A lot of people are saying what we\u2019re really missing is the fact that ordinary Iranians\u2014say, the bottom half of the income distribution\u2014are barely able to cope. It\u2019s a kind of Venezuelan situation, of just people really struggling to put food on the table. And that is, in a sense, the fundamental driver here of illegitimacy. Things are not helped by a massive and pervasive network of corruption.<\/p>\n
Because if you are having a purely market-operated system and the currency devalued, that\u2019s one thing. But Iran doesn\u2019t. To cope with the stresses of sanctions, it has a tiered exchange rate system. And that gives you some managerial control, but it also just opens the door to massive corruption, with insiders being able to get access to hard currency and protect their wealth. Other people aren\u2019t able to. And that then produces a sort of spiraling delegitimization. So if you ask me whether this looked like it had the makings of a macroeconomically driven destabilization, I think you\u2019d absolutely have to say, yeah, that\u2019s precisely what it looks like. And the current government is one that was actually put in, in a sense, to take responsibility. The central bank governor resigned.<\/p>\n
But in a situation like this, just looking historically at the record of countries under this kind of pressure, it gets worse politically before it gets better.<\/p>\n
CA:<\/strong> Reza Pahlavi, the crown prince of the Pahlavi dynasty, has now emerged as a kind of symbol of this uprising, with some in Iran calling for his return and Pahlavi himself suggesting he would be ready to do so if circumstances allowed for that. What are the economic circumstances under which Pahlavi is assuming this leadership role? What sort of wealth did the Pahlavi family have after leaving Iran? And how, exactly, has Reza Pahlavi built an opposition from abroad?<\/p>\nAT:<\/strong> There was quite a lot of forensic accountancy done in 1979, when the Pahlavi family went into exile, that looked into how much wealth they took with them. Because they were fabled for their wealth and spending. You know, they bought slices of German companies, they had these huge foundations, they had a huge slice of the Iranian economy, which was booming at the time with the oil revenue. I mean, the Germans really couldn\u2019t get enough of Iran in the 1970s, right? Because Iran\u2019s a huge country and, a bit like China, it actually needed German engineering kit to modernize. So it\u2019s not like the United Arab Emirates, which can\u2019t even absorb, really, the wealth it has. Iran could easily absorb its wealth and turn it into imports.<\/p>\nAnd so, when the Iranian monarchy went into exile, they took a lot of wealth with them. We think it\u2019s billions. It\u2019s not very well accounted for, but it\u2019s certainly billions. There were some shenanigans around property that was owned by the Pahlavi Foundation in New York. I think a lot of that actually ended up being suborned by the Iranian regime. That, at least, was the case for American prosecutors. But we think that the dowager empress, Farah Pahlavi, who was once a Jacqueline Kennedy kind of figure, has been sitting on hundreds of millions of dollars. She\u2019s very active in philanthropy. And the crown prince\u2014apparently, people think his budget is in the tens of millions of dollars. And that kind of wealth, if you start from where they did in \u201979, you\u2019re still wealthy now 40 years later, even if you\u2019ve been spending like a king.<\/p>\n
A lot of the Pahlavi movement\u2019s funding also apparently comes from the hugely successful Iranian diaspora, which is unsurprising\u2014you know, if you can mobilize Cuban resistance abroad, you can certainly mobilize Iranian resistance. It has, after all, been one of the most consequential diasporas in the world, in the United States, in Europe. And so, that is there, and it\u2019s potent. But it is, I have to say, shocking to really be even having to have this conversation. And I mean, if you look online, associations closely linked to Pahlavi are actually producing transition documents. I mean, they\u2019ve got, like, 170 pages of economic policy. I looked at it a little bit this morning. It\u2019s not great. There\u2019s not actually a lot there, but are they setting themselves up to look like a credible alternative? They clearly are attempting to do that. It would really be one of the more amazing reversals of the 21st century if that\u2019s the direction we end up heading in.<\/p>\n
CA:<\/strong> What geopolitics are at stake in how Iran develops from here? China is notably reliant on Iranian oil. If there\u2019s a change in regime in Iran that would seek closer ties to the United States, is that something that China should be concerned about?<\/p>\nAT:<\/strong> On paper, Iran and China are close allies. In 2021, they signed a big 25-year agreement. After the confrontation with Israel and the war with Israel in last June, there were rumors of Chinese military flights. After the performance of Chinese aircraft in the Pakistan-Indian clashes last year, people were speculating about the Iranians wanting some of the new Chinese hardware. If you dig into this, my sense is that it\u2019s misleading. So it is true that Iran is incredibly dependent on China as an oil market, as was true for Venezuela, as well, but the reverse isn\u2019t the case. So the vast majority of Iran\u2019s still continuing exports of oil, especially the ones we can trace, to China. And quite a lot of Iranian oil is exported through dark channels and ends up in China, because China\u2019s a huge economy, and they have these teapot refineries\u2014tiny little outfits on the coast of China, and they buy oil from tankers that spend a lot of time parked off Malaysia and Singapore, waiting to go somewhere and hoping that people lose track of them, right? That\u2019s one side of this. As a share of China\u2019s imports, it\u2019s about 13 percent. And if you add Venezuela, it\u2019s another 3 percent. So that\u2019s 16 percent of Chinese imports of oil that come from these two hotspots of geopolitics right now. And to be honest, China\u2019s doing them a favor by buying their oil, right? And China gets a discount for buying Iranian oil to the tune of $8 to $10 roughly.<\/p>\nBut if you just tweak middle-sized suppliers like Iran or Venezuela, all you do is affect choices by China to do bilateral deals. Because if China wants oil, it can just go to the general market and buy oil. It doesn\u2019t need to do these particular deals with these countries. And if you have regime change in either Venezuela or Iran, or both, they\u2019d still want to be selling to China. China\u2019s a prime customer. They\u2019ve got amazing credit. They\u2019re the whale in the oil market. Of course, you\u2019re going to want to sell to them. And the only reason right now that you\u2019re in this kind of world, in which we track individual tankers from these second-tier oil suppliers to particular destinations, is because of the sanctions regime.<\/p>\n
If we lift the sanctions regime on Iran, it\u2019s the same as with Venezuela. You don\u2019t need to occupy Venezuela to get Venezuelan oil for the United States. You just need to stop boycotting Venezuela, and Venezuela will try its damndest to sell you the oil, right? This isn\u2019t real estate. We\u2019re not haggling. Oil is one gigantic pool of oil, and you put your stuff out there. And then, in the end, of course, contracts emerge and then statisticians can measure how much goes from one country to the other. So, unless this spirals toward World War III, other scenarios of dramatic change would, generally speaking, open the market even more.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n
Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The uprising in Iran that resulted in a deadly crackdown last week was fueled at its root by economic grievances. Iran\u2019s currency has fallen precipitously in value after years of sanctions and economic mismanagement, with one U.S. dollar now worth some 1.4 million Iranian rials. The protest movement seems quelled for now. But the public\u2019s […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3647,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-3646","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-politcical-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/firearmupgrades.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3646","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/firearmupgrades.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/firearmupgrades.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/firearmupgrades.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/firearmupgrades.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3646"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/firearmupgrades.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3646\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/firearmupgrades.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/3647"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/firearmupgrades.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3646"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/firearmupgrades.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3646"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/firearmupgrades.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3646"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}